Mets Claim Ben Rortvedt: Dodgers' Unfortunate Timing Explained | MLB Offseason Moves (2026)

In a stunning turn of events, the New York Mets have swooped in to claim catcher Ben Rortvedt off waivers, leaving the Los Angeles Dodgers in a precarious position. But here's where it gets controversial: Was this a strategic masterstroke by the Mets, or a missed opportunity for the Dodgers to retain a valuable asset? Let’s dive into the whirlwind offseason of Rortvedt and unravel the complexities of this move.

Rortvedt’s journey has been nothing short of a rollercoaster. After stepping up for the Dodgers during a critical stretch last September—starting 19 out of 25 games, including the first four postseason games—he proved his worth as a reliable backup. The Dodgers valued him enough to sign him for $1.25 million in November, avoiding salary arbitration. However, this is the part most people miss: Rortvedt is out of options, and with the Dodgers already committed to Dalton Rushing as Will Smith’s backup, keeping him on the 40-man roster became a logistical nightmare. The Dodgers attempted to sneak him through waivers twice, but fate had other plans. First, the Reds claimed him in November, and now, the Mets have done the same.

Timing played a crucial role in Rortvedt’s second stint with the Dodgers. When the Reds designated him for assignment after signing Eugenio Suárez on February 3, the Dodgers acted swiftly. However, they couldn’t place anyone on the 60-day injured list to make room, as pitchers and catchers were set to report to camp soon. To secure Rortvedt, they designated Anthony Banda for assignment and later traded him to the Twins. But here’s the kicker: Had the Dodgers waited a bit longer, they could have potentially retained Rortvedt without such roster gymnastics. For instance, the Mets made space for him by placing Dedniel Núñez on the 60-day IL—a move the Dodgers could have mirrored with Brock Stewart, who was recovering from shoulder surgery.

The Dodgers’ decision to designate Rortvedt for assignment again came after signing Evan Phillips. Had they delayed Phillips’ signing by a day or two, they could have used Stewart’s injury timeline to their advantage. Instead, they placed Phillips on the 60-day IL when signing Kiké Hernández, who is also sidelined until midseason. This raises the question: Did the Dodgers miscalculate their timing, or were they outmaneuvered by the Mets?

Now, the Mets find themselves with four catchers on their 40-man roster, leaving Rortvedt’s future uncertain. With over five weeks until Opening Day, it’s entirely possible he could become available again. And this is where it gets even more intriguing: Was this a calculated risk by the Mets, or simply a stroke of luck? Could Rortvedt’s journey come full circle, or will he finally find a stable home?

This saga highlights the intricate dance of roster management in baseball, where timing, strategy, and a bit of luck can make all the difference. What do you think? Did the Dodgers mishandle Rortvedt’s situation, or did the Mets simply outplay them? Let’s spark a debate in the comments—agree or disagree, your take matters!

Mets Claim Ben Rortvedt: Dodgers' Unfortunate Timing Explained | MLB Offseason Moves (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Carmelo Roob

Last Updated:

Views: 6670

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Carmelo Roob

Birthday: 1995-01-09

Address: Apt. 915 481 Sipes Cliff, New Gonzalobury, CO 80176

Phone: +6773780339780

Job: Sales Executive

Hobby: Gaming, Jogging, Rugby, Video gaming, Handball, Ice skating, Web surfing

Introduction: My name is Carmelo Roob, I am a modern, handsome, delightful, comfortable, attractive, vast, good person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.